The Plan for Milton Keynes, Volume One: Milton Keynes Development Corporation


Mark Clapson
University of Westminster, Department of Social and Historical Studies


The UK’s largest new town, Milton Keynes, is the product of a transatlantic planning culture and a plan for a relatively low-density motorised city generously endowed with roads, parklands, and the infrastructure of cabling for communications technology. At its heart was the charismatic and infl uential Richard (Lord) Llewelyn-Davies. A Labour peer with various personal and professional interests in the USA, he drew upon the writings of American academics Melvin Webber and Herbert J. Gans, who were also invited to advise on social trends in relation to the urban context in the preparation for the Plan. The Plan for Milton Keynes bristled with an understanding that motorised transport and communications technology would shape the city of the future, and infl uence the nature and reach of ‘community’ and social interactions beyond the localised realm.

Prepared by Llewelyn-Davies, Weeks, Forestier-Walker and Bor, for Milton Keynes Development Corporation, and presented to the Minister for Housing and Local Government in 1970, the Plan for Milton Keynes is a vibrant expression of Sixties’ idealism and forward thinking. In creating the ‘Little Los Angeles in North Buckinghamshire’, a low-density city whose citizens mostly rely upon the private motor car for their mobility, the Plan has become increasingly unfashionable as agendas for sustainability have called motorisation into question. Yet the grid-roads and the gridsquares within them have been very popular with the people of Milton Keynes.

The Plan was in two volumes, but it is Volume 1, the shorter of the two, that encapsulates the key thinking and the principles that informed the planning of the new city. The second volume is more concerned with evidence and implementation, so Volume 1 is reproduced here. The expansive thinking behind the Plan for Milton Keynes has important lessons for the limitations of current urban transport policy, and that cosy notions of neighbourhood and locally-driven community have little resonance for understanding the character of social relations in the twenty-fi rst century. The planning of Milton Keynes was more realistic and nuanced than much urban policy formulation today.



July 31, 2019

Online ISSN


Print ISSN


Details about this monograph

ISBN-13 (15)